<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What shall we do for 3.0?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://derheckser.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/what-shall-we-do-for-3-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://derheckser.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/what-shall-we-do-for-3-0/</link>
	<description>Applications for the Apple iPhone ... brought 2U by der.heckser</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas Heck</title>
		<link>http://derheckser.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/what-shall-we-do-for-3-0/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andreas Heck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphone.derheckser.com/?p=124#comment-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, the two paragraphs are not stringently contradict themselves. For us I can say: We won&#039;t go mad in developing the newest technology for OS 3.0-only ... but to becalm a lot of customers, which have been demanding a peer-to-peer multiplayer option a lot of times, we&#039;ll develop this soon. For all other users of our apps without OS 3.0 their will still be the option of a single player game. After a long phase of cogitation I hold that a multiplayer option via an internet service doesn&#039;t make much sense for that special game type. Like in our days as a child we want to be face to face with the &quot;opponent&quot; :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the two paragraphs are not stringently contradict themselves. For us I can say: We won&#8217;t go mad in developing the newest technology for OS 3.0-only &#8230; but to becalm a lot of customers, which have been demanding a peer-to-peer multiplayer option a lot of times, we&#8217;ll develop this soon. For all other users of our apps without OS 3.0 their will still be the option of a single player game. After a long phase of cogitation I hold that a multiplayer option via an internet service doesn&#8217;t make much sense for that special game type. Like in our days as a child we want to be face to face with the &#8220;opponent&#8221; <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Touch</title>
		<link>http://derheckser.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/what-shall-we-do-for-3-0/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Touch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphone.derheckser.com/?p=124#comment-3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aren&#039;t your last two paragraphs contradicting themselves?

Will you go ahead with 3.0 features or watch the transition until e.g. more than half of Super Trump players have 3.0?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t your last two paragraphs contradicting themselves?</p>
<p>Will you go ahead with 3.0 features or watch the transition until e.g. more than half of Super Trump players have 3.0?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

